Francesco Maestrelli vs Matias Soto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Sep at 02:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Maestrelli vs M. Soto

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHI
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Maestrelli 1 - 0 Soto
They have played 2 sets in total, with Francesco Maestrelli winning 2 and Matias Soto winning 0. The last match between Francesco Maestrelli and Matias Soto was at the Villa Maria Challenger, 17-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Francesco Maestrelli getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maestrelli | 1 |
| Soto | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Villa Maria Challenger(09-17-25)
F. Maestrelli vs M. Soto H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $11,285 | Career Prize Money | $3,550 |
| 54.60% (190-158) | Career Total W/L | 58.91% (152-106) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
F. Maestrelli vs M. Soto Match Preview:
- Soto has a slight edge on second serve performance, securing 47.4% of points compared to Maestrelli's 44.96% in recent months.
- Both players display similar return stats for opponents' second serves, with Maestrelli at 46.52% and Soto at 46.17%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Soto leads with 27.98% while Maestrelli accounts for 27.15%.
- Under pressure, Maestrelli manages to save more breakpoints (56.82%) than Soto (54.78%). Could this hint at an advantage for Maestrelli?
- Maestrelli has a higher win rate over the past year, achieving 63.64% compared to Soto's 57.75%.
- Examining surface performance, Maestrelli excels on hard courts with a 57% win ratio, whereas Soto thrives on clay with 62% success.
- In Challenger or ITF events, Maestrelli's win percentage is significantly higher at 64.41% compared to Soto's 47.83%.
- Maestrelli has played against better-ranked opponents with an average ranking of 346.86, while Soto's opponents average at 366.03.
- Maestrelli has the upper hand in deciding sets, winning 76% versus Soto's 65% in the past year.
- Soto converts breakpoints more effectively, with 37.21% compared to Maestrelli's 34.66%.
Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating recent performance patterns, Soto exhibits a minor advantage in second serve points and breakpoint conversion success. These elements can be crucial in tight matches.
However, Maestrelli demonstrates resilience under pressure by saving more breakpoints and excelling in deciding sets, which may prove critical during pivotal moments in the match.
While Soto performs better on clay, Maestrelli's consistent edge in overall wins and tougher opposition suggests a broader level of experience in varied conditions.
Given these aspects, Maestrelli is likely to leverage their superior experience and pressure-handling capabilities to secure a win in the upcoming match.
Francesco Maestrelli vs Matias Soto Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Maestrelli vs M. Soto H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:35:28 | Average Match Time | 1:35:28 |
| 62% (37/60) | 1st Serve % | 69% (47/68) |
| 76% (28/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (28/47) |
| 43% (10/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 47% (32/68) | Return Points Win % | 37% (22/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Maestrelli Recent Matches Played
M. Soto Recent Matches Played

F. Maestrelli vs M. Soto Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.60% (190/158) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.91% (152/106) |
| 52.71% (428/384) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.85% (328/249) |
| 51.10% (3959/3789) | Games Win/Loss | 52.14% (2876/2640) |
| 56.25% (45/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (40/30) |
| 55.91% (123/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.02% (108/69) |
| 48.89% (22/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1586 | Aces Total | 882 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1132 | Total Double Faults | 729 |
| 1:45:27 | Average Match Time | 1:35:21 |
| 376.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 385.6 |
| 61% (14230/23439) | 1st Serve % | 59% (9385/15918) |
| 69% (9852/14230) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (6509/9385) |
| 46% (4253/9209) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3269/6533) |
| 43% (999/2307) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (667/1614) |
| 40% (9466/23560) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6471/16198) |
| 30.77% (4/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 53.25% (123/108) | Challenger W/L | 47.83% (55/60) |
| 65.59% (61/32) | Futures W/L | 68.57% (96/44) |
| 54% (187/345) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (148/251) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 56% (59/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (47/86) |
| 57% (68/119) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (38/64) |
| 89% (157/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (154/137) |
| 11% (157/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (154/16) |
| 25% (191/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (104/15) |